<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Power tie for the classy man.</title>
	<atom:link href="http://bravadoliving.com/2009/08/24/power-tie-for-the-classy-man/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://bravadoliving.com/2009/08/24/power-tie-for-the-classy-man/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=power-tie-for-the-classy-man</link>
	<description>For the evolving gentlemen</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 30 Jan 2012 04:26:08 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Trey</title>
		<link>http://bravadoliving.com/2009/08/24/power-tie-for-the-classy-man/comment-page-1/#comment-116</link>
		<dc:creator>Trey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Aug 2009 20:16:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thehautespot.com/?p=683#comment-116</guid>
		<description>Its not that silver isn&#039;t appropriate for work, or even that silver isn&#039;t a downright smart look at the office (see Roger Sterling in Mad Men); it&#039;s just that silver isn&#039;t a *power* tie at work, as the post originally suggested.

As to the logo as &#039;paisley&#039; - one can make an arguement for that. But it&#039;s still a logo. I&#039;m not (nor are traditional dictates of good taste) a fan of brand promotion ON better men&#039;s dress wear.

Different strokes, different folks, all that.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Its not that silver isn&#8217;t appropriate for work, or even that silver isn&#8217;t a downright smart look at the office (see Roger Sterling in Mad Men); it&#8217;s just that silver isn&#8217;t a *power* tie at work, as the post originally suggested.</p>
<p>As to the logo as &#8216;paisley&#8217; &#8211; one can make an arguement for that. But it&#8217;s still a logo. I&#8217;m not (nor are traditional dictates of good taste) a fan of brand promotion ON better men&#8217;s dress wear.</p>
<p>Different strokes, different folks, all that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: martinbalerdi</title>
		<link>http://bravadoliving.com/2009/08/24/power-tie-for-the-classy-man/comment-page-1/#comment-115</link>
		<dc:creator>martinbalerdi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Aug 2009 17:18:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thehautespot.com/?p=683#comment-115</guid>
		<description>I guess we are just going have to disagree and chalk it up to a difference in taste. I think that the way the logo is setup being small with the little stylized dots is very reminiscent of paiselys and I don&#039;t find the fact that they used their logo as a garish blunder since it doesn&#039;t really call much attention to itself and doesn&#039;t detract from the look of the tie. On the former point, I would wear a silver tie to work, I would wear this one, but maybe thats just me.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I guess we are just going have to disagree and chalk it up to a difference in taste. I think that the way the logo is setup being small with the little stylized dots is very reminiscent of paiselys and I don&#8217;t find the fact that they used their logo as a garish blunder since it doesn&#8217;t really call much attention to itself and doesn&#8217;t detract from the look of the tie. On the former point, I would wear a silver tie to work, I would wear this one, but maybe thats just me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Trey</title>
		<link>http://bravadoliving.com/2009/08/24/power-tie-for-the-classy-man/comment-page-1/#comment-114</link>
		<dc:creator>Trey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Aug 2009 16:01:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thehautespot.com/?p=683#comment-114</guid>
		<description>I disagree with both points on this tie; it is neither a &#039;power tie&#039;, nor is it &#039;classy.&#039;

While the colors may be elegant, the silver tones don&#039;t really speak to a strong business tie; but for the weddings &amp; evening events you mention, the monochrome would be perfect.

The real killer is the logo. It&#039;s great if you&#039;re being sponsored by Gucci. The need to advertise, even &#039;subtly,&#039; is not classy; it&#039;s gauche.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I disagree with both points on this tie; it is neither a &#8216;power tie&#8217;, nor is it &#8216;classy.&#8217;</p>
<p>While the colors may be elegant, the silver tones don&#8217;t really speak to a strong business tie; but for the weddings &amp; evening events you mention, the monochrome would be perfect.</p>
<p>The real killer is the logo. It&#8217;s great if you&#8217;re being sponsored by Gucci. The need to advertise, even &#8216;subtly,&#8217; is not classy; it&#8217;s gauche.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Served from: bravadoliving.com @ 2012-05-20 00:59:11 -->
